Share This

Wednesday 15 December 2021

Off to a flying start in new area: China set to lead the global charge in flying taxis

 

Flight plan: a pilot testing a passenger drone in the southern city of Guangzhou. china daily/ANN


JUST how close are we to having flying taxis? In China, there is a rush of homegrown talent and international companies that recognise the value of China’s markets being ever-receptive to novelty.

Despite the technical hurdles faced, the speed at which entrepreneurs are moving makes the time frame for a viable service coming to Chinese cities a matter of years, not decades.

Over the last half decade, China has come to dominate aerial technologies. The global drone success story speaks for itself, with companies such as DJI and Autel Robotics commanding dominant market shares and supplying the majority of flying products to both professionals and enthusiasts worldwide.

Likewise, China-based flying taxi companies, such as Ehang, are advancing fast, carrying out multiple test flights with live passengers and employees, with promising results.

The company even has its eyes set on expansion once the technology is established, with Japan as a potential market, and also a venture into the delivery sector, which could start as early as 2023.

China’s reputation as a fast adopter of disruptive technologies is a major incentive behind the growth of flying taxi research in the country.

Reservations about getting in a new autonomous air vehicle and flying hundreds of metres in the sky may make less adventurous consumers elsewhere stick to their cars for a while.

German company Volocopter has this year created a craft that can take off and land safely within controlled conditions, also with the aim of launching an air ride service in China.

In a statement, Florian Reuter, the CEO of Volcopter, said: “China is the single biggest market opportunity for the urban air mobility industry.”

China has a history of taking up new technology quickly. Those invested in the future of affordable electric air mobility industries in China will certainly hope that they will follow the likes of smartphone cashless payments, and hail and ride (terrestrial) apps.

Both leapfrogged more dated practices in other parts of the world, such as “chip and pin” payments in Europe and the United States, and were adopted with a huge level of success across China’s huge economically active population.

Regional authorities across China are gearing up to facilitate flying taxi services.

Hunan, Anhui and Jiangxi provinces are all supporting the concept of low altitude aviation, investing heavily in airport construction, landing fields and tourism sectors, which will no doubt be boosted by the increase in transport efficiency.

The high expectations for what is coming put pressure on engineers to deliver designs that are practical for mainstream adoption. Noise levels are a major concern, as flying taxis will operate at a much lower altitude than traditional jet airplanes, which frequently cause residential disturbances at heights 10 or 20 times higher. The fact that these taxis are universally electric in design is a major bonus, offering low noise levels, meaning that they should be inaudible around 100m above street level.

Operating on exchangeable batteries also provides environmental benefits, making replacement of parts straightforward, saving on material resources and emissions. Many models are fuelled by several different batteries at once, providing safety fail-safes, meaning that if one or indeed several rotors fail, the aircraft can still land safely.

China is leading the charge; however, the Netherlands, Qatar and New Zealand are also currently carrying out flying taxi trials.

This cannot come soon enough. In cities around the world, ground transportation infrastructure is creaking, and each week, hours of productivity are wasted by commuters being stuck in congested, polluting traffic.

Over the next five years, these trials will morph into services open to the public, and as prices drop, accessibility will no doubt increase. Getting passengers to be comfortable with flying taxis in their cities and their autonomous pilot systems, however, will be a different task, that may take more time and proof of safe practice.

If any market will welcome it first, though, it will be in China. — china daily/ANN


 Source link

 

Related posts:

 

China in top spot for research amid US struggling to ‘contain’ China rise

China in first place globally for top papers

 

Chinese University Tops MIT in Engineering Rankings

 

China's leading spot in the race for technological innovation

 

US loses top spot to China in chemistry papers amid ...

 

China beats US to the top spot in filing international patents

Chop off Dr. Mahathir's chopstick racist politics

 

Former Malaysian PM Mahathir Mohamad had referred to the continued use of chopsticks by the Chinese community in Malaysia.PHOTO: ST FILE
 
 
 

The outdated worldview and narrow thinking expressed by former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad in his new book cannot be allowed to undermine the country's race relations, said Malaysian Chinese Association (MCA) secretary-general Chong Sin Woon.

Datuk Chong urged all Malaysians not to be easily swayed by the words of the former premier.

"Instead, commit ourselves to be more open-minded, progressive and accepting of others' cultures so that we can build a more united Malaysia together.

"We do not want to see Malaysia's precious multiracial ties get strained because of his new book and his remarks, which propagate racial division and extremism," he said in a statement yesterday.

Mr Chong noted that Malaysians should discuss nation-building from a progressive and diverse perspective.

At a book launch on Sunday (Dec 12), Tun Dr Mahathir had referred to the continued use of chopsticks by the Chinese community in Malaysia.

"The Chinese eat with chopsticks, they don't eat with their hands. They have not adopted the Malaysian way of eating food.

"They retained the chopstick, which is an identity from China, not Malaysia, and many other things," he reportedly said.

Mr Chong said MCA has been expending all efforts to protect and preserve the cultural diversity and rights of each ethnicity, including the freedom to learn one's mother tongue as provisioned under the federal Constitution, as well as the prevailing principles of moderation, freedom and democracy.

As a former prime minister who led the country and achieved economic success during his tenure in the 1990s, Dr Mahathir had his fair share of contributions and failures, Mr Chong said.

"And yet, after so many years, he is still unable to break free from the extreme, racial mindset.

"At 96, one would expect Tun Mahathir to have a more seasoned outlook and come up with wiser approaches to current affairs.

"Regrettably, the nonagenarian remains unchanged in his old ways, still bitter and critical about the specifics of the ethnicity and cultures of others," he said.

 
MCA vice-president Tan Teik Cheng also criticised Dr Mahathir's remarks, saying the Langkawi MP's narrow and racist values "have no place in Malaysia's multicultural society".

"Despite the full awareness of Malaysia's multiracial composition and having served as our nation's premier twice, Dr Mahathir remains besotted with inciting differences in the rakyat's ethnic culture, language and lifestyle as his political capital.

"How ironic and contradictory from a disposition expected from Malaysia's most senior political figure," he said in a statement.

Datuk Tan said Dr Mahathir's remarks betray his preference that other ethnic groups must assimilate.

"Undermining national unity and instigating racial sentiments by stirring one against another, in this aspect, taking the examples of eating with hands versus eating with chopsticks is un-Malaysian and unhealthy," he said.

Whether the Malaysian Chinese eat with their hands, chopsticks, or forks and spoons or knives, Mr Tan said their Malaysian identity and citizenship cannot be changed or denied.

Another former prime minister, Najib Razak, took to his Facebook page to aim a jibe at Dr Mahathir, posting an old photo of the 96-year-old using chopsticks to toss yusheng.

Source link

Malaysians slam Dr M’s ‘chopsticks’ remark, say it avoids the real issues 

 

Tun Dr Mahathir, you are wrong – An open letter to former ...

 

Sin Chew: Dear Dr M, you are wrong and prejudicial | The Star

 

A New Malaysian way to deal with Mahathir's Chopstick politics

 

A New Malaysian way to deal with Mahathir's Chopstick politics

 

Related posts:

 

  A PARADIGM shift occurs when the usual ways of thinking or doing things are replaced by new and different ways. This normally happens w...
 

Monday 13 December 2021

Malays in need of a paradigm shift

 


A PARADIGM shift occurs when the usual ways of thinking or doing things are replaced by new and different ways. This normally happens when fundamentals are progressively changed.

Developing a country takes time, starting with a holistic education that seeks to address the emotional, social and ethical needs of students, apart from academic studies and skills training. Students must reflect on their actions and how they impact the local and global community, and engage in projects that require critical thinking skills towards solving real-world problems.

But if education is centred on rote learning just to pass school examinations and plagiarism to gain academic qualifications, young adults will be unproductive, and the country will remain poor. This is evident in Malaysia as huge numbers of graduates are churned out every year but most are underemployed or remain unemployed for months.

Not in Singapore, though. It separated from Malaysia in 1965 and developed on its own to become a rich nation, thanks mainly to good governance and sound education. Although the cost of living in Singapore is high to match the high living standards, the average Singaporean salary is several times higher than in Malaysia, allowing for more disposable income and savings. Hence, there are about a million Malaysians, or former Malaysians, residing in Singapore, and another 350,000 workers and students who commuted daily from Johor in pre-pandemic times. Malaysia had also lost much of its human capital to many countries around the world over the years, initially to Britain and then to the United States and Australia and, in recent years, China.

While other non-english speaking countries have adopted or promoted English as their second language to be better connected to the world, we are doing the exact opposite. In fact, some politicians seem bent on nurturing island mentalities in cultivating their support base by sowing fear of other races, religions and languages. Those who truly love their own race, religion and language would focus on lifting their community, which would be admired universally. But such efforts require too much hard work, it seems. Sadly, our country will not be transformed if people remain insular, if we remain, as the Malay proverb puts it, “katak di bawah tempurung” (frog under a coconut) shell).

One of the best ways for Malaysians to be exposed to the world is to be multilingual by not only learning our national language but also other important languages. Mandarin and Tamil could easily be learned in vernacular primary schools, and these students could later contribute greatly to economic and cultural ties with China and South India. Likewise for Arabic, Japanese, Korean, German, French and Spanish. In any case, learning at least three languages would expose Malaysians to a great variety of cultures and ideas.

Apart from the valuable exposure gained by communicating with people of different races, religion and cultures, it is also necessary for those at the top to come down from their ivory towers.

Recently, Transport Minister Datuk Seri Wee Ka Siong made a surprise visit to the Road Transport Department in Johor Baru and was shocked by the long queue for counter service. He rightfully described the counter service system as “ancient”. He then used Facebook to voice his unhappiness about a host of problems and the immediate actions that he had taken.

If we wish to modernise, we should not continue to be bogged down by antiquated methods and mindsets. We should continuously take small, medium and large incremental steps to move forward.

If not, we will stagnate and be left behind while other countries, such as Indonesia, race ahead. But some of our politicians seem to prefer to harp on racial, religious and language issues, and raise petty matters in Parliament hoping to gain popularity.

Perhaps a paradigm shift will only occur when a coalition wins by a two-thirds majority in the next general elections and the economy ends up in total shambles. Perhaps if everyone is forced to work together to rescue our country from total disaster, we could still rise from the ashes.

- S CHAN Kuala Lumpur

Source link

Related posts:

All the majority Malays need to change is to abandon their fear of the minority non-Malays, well said Datuk Zaid Ibrahim 

Liberating the Malay mindset, the right way to speak out


The real Malay dilemma: race, religion & politics messed up!

 

 

Liberating Malay mind: Shed ‘excess baggage’ of privileges !

 Malays must shed ‘excess baggage’ of privileges, says Rafidah 

 
 
 

Mutual trust and understanding essential: Lessons from China’s development model

 

China can also take the lead in regional good governance.

TO achieve international connectivity, close international cooperation and coordination is required at all times, said political analyst Bunn Nagara.

And this also requires a certain level of trust and confidence among countries, he stressed.

For China and Malaysia, however, this is being challenged by active disputes in the South China Sea between China and Malaysia’s Asean neighbours as well as other “security incidents”, said Nagara at the recent Friends of Silk Road forum organised by the Malaysia-china Friendship Association.

“Some of these altercations have been bitter and alarming, and steadily more incidents have affected Malaysia.”

Nagara said these are avoidable and costly problems which have a significant impact on regional policy.

“They are costly because without these unnecessary challenges, regional cooperation, integration and development would improve tremendously. They occur at great cost to all of us.”

Together, China and Asean countries can do much more and achieve greater heights of development, but political will and courage are needed to turn wise thoughts into reality, he said.

“Some argue that the South China Sea issue is a key hurdle to deepening our bilateral relationship but I don’t think that because this comes from history and this can be discussed and resolved diplomatically.

“The immediate problem is not the conflicting claims, which have been there for years and will still be there for years to come. The outstanding problem is the possible actions that happen can be a very dangerous situation.“

“Closer cooperation and coordination are key, and whether and how far we can progress and succeed on these issues remain to be seen. I hope we have the political will to do what is necessary for all our interests in this region. I also hope that we can all work more closely together to achieve these necessary ends.

“For example, China and Asean should have quiet diplomatic discussions, away from all the publicity, so that we can talk frankly and quietly behind the scenes, so that others may not intervene.”

Another area where China can take the lead is in regional good governance, Nagara said.

“China could help us as well in terms of showing what kind of governance is needed to ensure sustainable economic growth.”

He explained that an unfortunate aspect of rapid economic development in this region is corrupt practices and persons.

“China has done a very good job in clamping down on corruption, which many other countries would like to do as well. But since corruption is often an international crime with cross-border implications, governments need to work more closely against it. An effective regional anti-corruption regime will need efficient extradition laws to deal with suspected individuals and fugitives from justice.”

China can be a global leader in anti-corruption laws and action, said Nagara.

“No country can object to that, and all countries will then follow China’s positive leadership in this effort. Many of these solutions are vital and not difficult to implement, given the political will.

“They are necessary if greater economic growth, with more development through better regional integration, is to be assured.”

 Source link

Lessons from China’s development model

Comprehensive initiative: Farmer Wang Enhai loading baskets of green plum in Quanfa Village of Wushan County, China, for sale. Like many others in Quanfa, Wang managed to climb out of poverty through China’s targeted poverty reduction programme. — Xinhua/file photo

DESPITE the Covid-19 pandemic and the global economic stagnation in 2020, China managed to record 2.3% growth and a US$4.6tril (RM17.69tril) trade volume last year, becoming the only major economy to grow during the devastating year.

Already the world’s second largest economy with a GDP of US$14.7tril (RM61.92tril), it is no surprise that China managed to bounce back easily.

As Malaysia-China Friendship Association (PPMC) president Datuk Abdul Majit Ahmad Khan put it, China’s achievements in development are “spectacular”.

He noted, “This is clearly demonstrated in the transformation of the country’s status from a poor nation to a moderately prosperous one. It is a record in human history that a country has achieved so much prosperity and stability within the space of 40 years.

“From a ‘closed nation’, China today is an engine of regional and global growth. Its development model has provided opportunities for investment, trade, tourism, and China has become the global hub of supply chain, manufacturing, and services in trade.”

The question is whether China’s successful development model could be adopted elsewhere.

This has been the subject of debate among many analysts and was one of the discussion points of a recent Friends of Silk Road forum organised by the PPMC with the support of the Chinese Embassy in Malaysia entitled “The global significance of China’s develop-mental model”.

Held in conjunction with the 30th anniversary of the establishment of China-Asean relations, the aim of the webinar was to continue the ongoing dialogue and confidence- building over the years between Malaysia and China. It also provided an opportunity for reflection on the 100th anniversary of the Com-munist Party of China as well as China’s transformation in the context of Malaysia-China’s relationship.

“Malaysia and the Asean region have indeed gained tremendously from China’s transformation as reflected in the deep and strong economic linkages between the two regions,” said Abdul Majit.

Comprehensive poverty eradication


One area is poverty eradication, said Dr Ge Hongliang, deputy dean of the Asean College of Guangxi University for Nationalities in China.

Delving into the relationship between Malaysia and China, specifically Sino-Malaysian cooperation in poverty reduction, Ge highlighted that China’s poverty eradication programme is a topic that is important in the study of China and South-East Asia.

Relating his firsthand witness account of China’s development, Wang Yuzhu, director of Apec (Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation) and East Asia Cooperation Center at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said he could see China’s “economic miracle” in his own life’s journey – from his humble beginnings on a farm in a rural Chinese village to a comfortable life as a public servant.

Wang concurred that the republic’s comprehensive poverty eradication programme is one of the important factors underpinning the country’s rise.

“Based on current poverty standards, 770 million rural poor people in China have been lifted out of poverty since China opened up. This accounted for more than 70% of global poverty reduction population during the same period according to the World Bank’s international poverty standards,” he said, referring to the “China’s Practice in Human Poverty Reduction” white paper.

China’s poverty eradication initiative was effective as it was targeted, with meticulous planning such as precise project arrangements, inch-perfect measures as well as accurate use of funds, personnel and other resources, Wang noted.

There is a learning value from it for developing countries, including Malaysia, to achieve complete poverty reduction and modernisation, said Ge.

“This has undoubtedly created a useful basis for China and Malaysia to continue to strengthen cooperation on the poverty reduction agenda.”

Adding that extra attention needs to be given to the rural and less developed areas, he said China and Malaysia would be able to have mutual cooperation through this, specifically to develop agriculture.

Tourists enjoying handmade lanterns displayed by a handicraft company in Guangling County of Datong. Under China's poverty eradication programme, the company has helped over 200 impoverished residents to by providing them with occupational training. — Xinhua/File photo 

Tourists enjoying handmade lanterns displayed by a handicraft company in Guangling County of Datong. Under China's poverty eradication programme, the company has helped over 200 impoverished residents to by providing them with occupational training. — Xinhua/File photo

Vital global role

There is a global significance to China’s rise, said Wang.

With its land and population size, China is an important part of the world, he noted.

“China is also the world’s factory – its exports account for about 16% of the world’s goods. Therefore, China’s problems are not only its own problems but also global problems. China’s development is an important part of world development.”

China would also need to play a big role in protecting the environment, he noted.

“We need strive to reach the peak of carbon dioxide emissions by 2030 and to achieve carbon neutrality by 2060, as put forward by the slogan ‘green water and green mountains are golden mountains and silver mountains’.”

Ultimately, said Wang, China and the world need to develop together.

“China adheres to the policy of good neighbour and friendship to safeguard regional and world peace. China also actively participates in regional cooperation, adheres to multilateralism, and promotes regional and global economic integration,” he said.

He added that China is also working together with other countries to build “a peaceful and prosperous community with a shared future for humankind” through the Belt and Road Initiative.

However, Wang believes China’s “development experience” is distinctly Chinese. He listed 10 points behind China’s rise which included upholding the party’s leadership, putting the people first, following the “Chinese path”, promoting a united front, and remaining committed to self-reform.

Independent political analyst and honorary research fellow at the Perak Academy Bunn Nagara gave an in-depth and comprehensive analysis of Malaysia-China relations and also the impact of China’s rise and how it has continued to reshape regional geopolitical dynamics.

He too noted that China’s development model is of great interest to almost everyone, from economists to policymakers and anyone with interest in political economy, strategic studies and international relations. It is also of great interest to people in many different countries in the developing world, in the developed world, among former colonies and former colonial powers, and among emerging markets.

“China’s development model is special and its development record is spectacular for the following reasons.

“Development is rapid, even for the large size of the country. It is essentially a hybrid endogenous model unique to China. Develop-ment does not derive from colonial conquests and plunder of other lands.

“China’s sheer size means the impact on many other countries is considerable.”

But there are important caveats in considering China’s development model, he said: “First, that China did not begin with a single and fixed model 100 years ago to arrive at where it is today. It began with a set of values, principles and goals, selecting and then adapting theory to suit local conditions at the time, with what is called Chinese characteristics.

“The process is grounded in pragmatism... and is evolutionary, incremental and revolutionary as the need arises at each stage. Periodic reflection and correction then helped to refocus policy towards the original values, principles and goals.”

Despite the historical hardships that China has endured, it has also been fortunate to be able to experiment and develop its own model of development, free from the pressures and conditionalities imposed by multilateral agencies on so many developing nations, Nagara added. Like other developed economies in East Asia, China has shown that it can overcome this development dependency trap.

Nagara feels that Malaysia and China can learn from each other.

“It is just as important for countries to avoid copying a development model from somewhere else as it is for any country to reject imposing its model on others. China has wisely chosen not to export its development model, even though other countries may learn from it.... But no one size fits all; we’ve got to learn from one another – pick and choose what fits us the best.”

Another Malaysian expert, Datuk Dr Irmohizam Ibrahim, who is an adjunct professor at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia and visiting professor at the Center of Malaysia Scholars in Huaqiao University, China, suggested ways in which Malaysia and China could work together to jumpstart Malaysia’s pandemic-stricken economy, including considering some opening up of the borders with a travel bubble.

Irmohizam also stressed the importance of passing the baton to the next generation to continue maintaining this bridge-building work that is ongoing between Malaysia and China.

“We should encourage further exchanges between China and Malaysia, specifically through people-to-people exchanges, especially the young,” he said. 

By HARIATI AZIZAN

Source link

 

Related posts

 

Supporters of US President Donald Trump protest outside the US Capitol on Wednesday, in Washington, DC. Demonstrators breached security and...

 

Cheah Cheng Hye: Malaysians should find this campaign of special interest because China, like Malaysia, is trying to break o...
 
The Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee presides over the sixth plenary session of the 19th CPC Centra...
 
A view of the US Capitol Building. Photo: IC Chinese Foreign Ministry on Sunday released a report on US democracy, exposing the deficienci...
 
  Biden opens democracy summit, 'shows no confidence' The virtual "Summit for Democracy" held by the US kicked off on...
 
  Illustration: Liu Rui/GT    NGOs often conjure up the images of activists getting busy banning ivory trad

 

Beijing Winter Olympics   Does Anyone Care About Their Absence? They Are Not Even Invited!   US' act around the Beijing Winter Olympics ..

Friday 10 December 2021

US Democracy Summit: An undemocratic ‘summit for democracy

 

The virtual "Summit for Democracy" held by the US kicked off on Thursday, but Chinese analysts said that Washington just ...



Democracy should reflect the will of the people. But what happens when that will is ignored? The U.S. describes itself as a democratic country. Yet, it has rampant gun violence and racial discrimination, widening social inequality, needless overseas wars, and the worst record of COVID-19 deaths globally. In an original two-part series, CGTN takes a hard look at how democracy is slowly eroding in the U.S. and how it may spread throughout the world if not stopped. Join us for "U.S. Democracy: A reality check," only on CGTN. #WhoDefinesDemocracy #WholeProcessDemocracy
 

 'Summit for Democracy': How a single toxic hornet hijacks a group of bees

Illustration: Chen Xia/GT
Illustration: Chen Xia/GT 

The US-initiated "Summit for Democracy" began Thursday night Beijing time. Several hours before its opening, Pakistan, which was among the participants the US had invited, announced that it would not attend. Pakistan's announcement triggered much discussion. In addition to the heated discussion of why the US invited certain countries and regions but did not invite some others, the latest topic has taken the real theme of "democracy" away.

The US has used much of its strength to snub China and Russia and controversially defined which country or region is democratic and which is not. The forces it tries to curry favor from are definitely not as many as it has offended. It must be said that the US has become so fragile that it has to go around in such a big circle to beg for a little support. The result is destined.

Democracy is not achieved by talking big, but by a country's arduous work. Democracy is not the franchise model of chain stores where the US formulates rules and rations ingredients, with the same cartoon character of an old guy standing in front of each entrance. The team of US President Joe Biden must have eaten too much KFC and McDonald's when they were young.

Biden convened this "summit for democracy" at a time when US national governance, including its democratic system, was criticized the most. From the West's point of view, the summit should be held as a "criticism summit" against the US. The US has been a drag on Western democracy, and this is the major reason why Western democracy has felt a sense of crisis. Discussions about the US' "decline" have flooded the world's public opinion field. From the COVID-19 fight to anti-racial discrimination, the US has not done anything worthy of being put on a window display in the West. Western democracy has lost its face by following the US.

The very purpose of this "summit for democracy" is to use a big pomp to remind the world: The "declining" US you talk about is still the boss and other countries should choose the right "big brother" to follow. Washington wants to form a "democratic gang," but the world has turned that old page long ago. Even street singers use QR codes to get paid nowadays.

Some say that the "summit for democracy" may become one of Biden's few political legacies. But is it pitiful for Biden? No wonder some Chinese people said ironically that even the head of a county in China is more practical and capable than the US president.

This so-called summit for democracy is bound to be a hypocritical exposition of all kinds of international political machinations within the US-led gang. This conference in the name of "democracy" will definitely be nailed to the pillar of shame in history, just because it deepens the divisions of the world and intensifies confrontation between major powers. In this sense, it may be regarded as the "political legacy" of the Biden administration, but definitely a negative asset.

It's a joke that the US, trapped in the COVID-19 epidemic, even dares to summon a "summit for democracy" and attempt to give a voice to democracy when it has just run away from Afghanistan, the "laboratory for democracy." A swarm of innocent bees is being hijacked by a toxic hornet who teaches them to sting, not to produce honey.

A farce is being staged. The world did not host an infrastructure summit, an education summit or a poverty alleviation summit, but the US created a "summit for democracy." So far, what has caused the most global deaths are the COVID-19 pandemic that ravages across the world, as well as the Western-style "democracy" imposed by the US and West on developing countries. The US didn't have to hold a "summit for democracy." It would be best for it to open its border and let refugees from Third World countries who suffered immensely from Western-style democracy enter its territory and enjoy "authentic democracy."

Source link

 

An undemocratic 'summit for democracy 

An undemocratic 'summit for democracy'

 

US President Joe Biden arriving to deliver his remarks at the virtual Summit for Democracy at the White House in Washington DC. — AFP

THIS week the United States hosted an online “Summit for Democracy” (Dec 9-10), which it claimed was to “focus on challenges and opportunities facing democracies” and to “defend democracy and human rights at home and abroad”.

Unfortunately, it might end up to be nothing but an attempt to divide the world into opposing political camps and advance the US’S own strategic agenda with democracy as an excuse. If so, the meeting couldn’t be further away from the spirit of democracy. China firmly opposes the move by the US, one that is dominated by Cold War mentality and which seeks to incite ideological confrontation and risks creating new divisive lines in the international community.

With this summit, the US seeks to empower itself to determine who is democratic and who is not based on its own liking, and measure the merits of other countries’ democracy with its own yardstick. This is, in fact, privatisation and labelling of democracy and will make the “Summit for Democracy” itself undemocratic.

The world today is facing pressing global challenges such as an ongoing pandemic and climate change, and some countries, including the US, are troubled by a worsening democracy and many domestic problems. Under such circumstances, countries have every reason to prioritise the needs of the people, advocate unity and cooperation, and strive for development and progress.

Perhaps the last thing a responsible major country should do is to turn a blind eye to its own problems and scapegoat others politically. Ironically, it is the people who have to pay the price at the end of the day.

While upholding democracy at home, countries should also support greater democracy in international relations, uphold the Un-centred international system and the international order based on international law.

Efforts are also urgently needed to practice true multilateralism and make global governance more inclusive. These are the shared aspirations of the international community and meet the trend of our times. Unfortunately, the US summit did not indicate if it would advance these goals, seeming instead to make itself a disruptive factor.

China believes that democracy means, in essence, that people are the masters of the country. Democracy is practiced to meet people’s needs, bringing the people a decent and happy life and progress for the country and beyond.

Having seen a number of successful and failed cases of democracy worldwide, countries across the world must have come to realise one thing: true democracy will only dawn when it is deeply rooted in a country and fits well with its own national conditions and stage of development. Efforts to mechanically copy the political systems and democratic models of others have never worked and never will. Neither do attempts to impose one’s own political will on others.

When it comes to China’s case, the Chinese people have followed the political development path with Chinese characteristics and created the model of whole-process ....

An undemocratic 'summit for democracy

An undemocratic 'summit for democracy'

 

RELATED ARTICLES
 

 

Related posts:

 

Supporters of US President Donald Trump protest outside the US Capitol on Wednesday, in Washington, DC. Demonstrators breached security and...
 
A view of the US Capitol Building. Photo: IC Chinese Foreign Ministry on Sunday released a report on US democracy, exposing the deficienci...
 
The Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee presides over the sixth plenary session of the 19th CPC Centra...
 
Cheah Cheng Hye: Malaysians should find this campaign of special interest because China, like Malaysia, is trying to break o...
 
Beijing Winter Olympics   Does Anyone Care About Their Absence? They Are Not Even Invited!   US' act around the Beijing Winter Olympics ...